My Profile

Search abstracts

Lewis Sheiner


2017
Budapest, Hungary



2016
Lisboa, Portugal

2015
Hersonissos, Crete, Greece

2014
Alicante, Spain

2013
Glasgow, Scotland

2012
Venice, Italy

2011
Athens, Greece

2010
Berlin, Germany

2009
St. Petersburg, Russia

2008
Marseille, France

2007
KÝbenhavn, Denmark

2006
Brugge/Bruges, Belgium

2005
Pamplona, Spain

2004
Uppsala, Sweden

2003
Verona, Italy

2002
Paris, France

2001
Basel, Switzerland

2000
Salamanca, Spain

1999
Saintes, France

1998
Wuppertal, Germany

1997
Glasgow, Scotland

1996
Sandwich, UK

1995
Frankfurt, Germany

1994
Greenford, UK

1993
Paris, France

1992
Basel, Switzerland



Printable version

PAGE. Abstracts of the Annual Meeting of the Population Approach Group in Europe.
ISSN 1871-6032

Reference:
PAGE 23 (2014) Abstr 3162 [www.page-meeting.org/?abstract=3162]


PDF poster/presentation:
Click to open Click to open

Poster: Drug/Disease modeling - Other topics


II-18 Mats Magnusson A Population PK/PD Analysis of Nebivolol and Valsartan Combination Therapy

Mats O. Magnusson (1), E. Niclas Jonsson (1), Chun Lin Chen (2), Timothy Carrothers (2), Parviz Ghahramani (2)

(1) Pharmetheus, Uppsala, Sweden (2) Forest Research Institute, Jersey City, NJ, USA

Objectives: To develop population PK/PD models that describe the effects of placebo, nebivolol and valsartan as single drugs and as a fixed-dose combination (FDC) on both sitting cuff-measured blood pressure (BP) and 24-hour ambulatory measured BP (diastolic and systolic BP), and to use the model to further simulate possible combinations of dosages.

Methods: Population PK/PD models were developed in NONMEM V7.2.0 [1] based on data from the Phase 3 study (NAC- MD-01), utilizing estimates of exposure for each individual derived from a population PK model. The exposure-response population included 761 patients for the sitting cuff-measured BP and 746 patients for ambulatory measured BP. The BP lowering drug effects of nebivolol and valsartan were described by inhibitory Emax models with a parameter (alpha) to account for the interaction between the compounds. The diurnal rhythm in the ambulatory BP data was described by the sum of cosine functions [2].

Results: For the sitting cuff-measured BP model, total effect was comprised of the drug effect and placebo effect. There was no detectable placebo response in the ambulatory BP data. The maximum drug effects were 13 mmHg for sitting cuff-measured BP, and 14 and 19 mmHg for diastolic and systolic ambulatory measured BP, respectively. The exposure-response relationships were statistically significant in the valsartan and nebivolol monotherapy arms as well as in all FDC arms, suggesting increasing efficacy with increasing PK exposures. The alpha parameter was estimated to be positive in all sitting cuff-measured and ambulatory measured BP models, and this effect was further characterized as partially additive.

The PK/PD model was used to simulate possible dosages in mono-, and combination therapy, including that of dosing strengths that were not studied in the NAC-MD-01 study. The model-predicted change from baseline in diastolic and systolic BPs demonstrated that all studied FDC doses (5/80 mg, 5/160 mg, 10/160 mg, 10/320 mg, 20/320 mg, and 40/320 mg) had greater BP reductions compared to their monotherapy components in a partially additive manner. An exposure response relationship was also evident between the FDC dose groups.

Conclusions: Modeling and simulation of nebivolol and valsartan combination therapy demonstrate a partially additive effect on diastolic and systolic sitting cuff-measured BP as well as on diastolic and systolic 24-hour ambulatory measured BP among all FDC doses studied.



References:
[1] Beal SL, Sheiner LB, Boeckmann AJ & Bauer RJ (Eds.) NONMEM Users Guides. 1989-2011. Icon Development Solutions, Ellicott City, Maryland, USA.
[2] Hempel G, Karlsson MO, de Alwis DP, Toublanc N, McNay J and Schaefer HG, 1998, Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of moxonidine using 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurements. Clin Pharmacol Ther vol. 64: 622–635.