2021 - Online - In the cloud

PAGE 2021: Methodology - Other topics
Leonid Gibiansky

Calibration of an IgG turnover model using data from administration of monoclonal antibodies targeting FcRn receptor

Leonid Gibiansky, Ekaterina Gibiansky

QuantPharm LLC, North Potomac, MD US

Background: FcRn recycling plays an important role in non-specific clearance of endogenous and therapeutic antibodies [1]. The following compartmental model of IgG turnover was proposed to describe the process [2-5]:

 

          dA1/dt = I0 - (k10 - Vmax/(KM+A1/V1))∙A1 - k12∙A1 + k21∙A2,          A1(0) = IgG0∙V1;                                             (1)

          dA2/dt = k12∙A1 - k21∙A2;                                                                  A2(0) = IgG0∙V2;                    

         I0 = (k10-Vmax/(KM+IgG0))∙IgG0∙V1,

where A1 and A2 are the IgG amounts in the central and peripheral compartments, I0 is zero-order IgG production rate, k12=Q/V1, k21=Q/V2 are the inter-compartment rate constants; Q, V1, and V2 are inter-compartment clearance, central volume, and peripheral volume, respectively; k10=CL/V1 and CL are IgG non-specific elimination rate and clearance in absence of FcRn recycling, and Vmax and KM are the Michaelis-Menten parameters. The Michaelis-Menten term in the model represents FcRn-mediated IgG recycling from the intra-cellular space to the central compartment. Several different sets of model parameters were suggested depending on data and techniques used for model calibration [5]. Recent studies of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAb) targeting the FcRn receptor provide the longitudinal data of IgG suppression resulting from blocking FcRn recycling [6, 7] and thus allow to re-evaluate and update the IgG turnover model.

 

Purpose: We aim to use these data to evaluate the IgG turnover model, to modify the model, and to obtain the parameter estimates consistent with the observed data.

Methods: Pharmacodynamic data of an anti-FcRn mAb were obtained by digitizing from [7]. The mAb binds with high affinity to the FcRn receptor and prevents endogenous IgG from binding FcRn, thus increasing IgG clearance and decreasing its concentrations. The data of FcRn receptor occupancy by mAb and IgG concentrations following administration of various single and multiple doses of this mAb [7] were used to evaluate IgG turnover model predictions for all previously identified sets of parameters. Assuming that FcRn recycling is proportional to the fraction of FcRn receptors unbound by mAb, the time course of IgG suppression was predicted and compared with the observed data. Based on the evaluation results and mechanistic considerations, the model was modified. A new set of parameters was obtained, by estimating some of the parameters and fixing others at typical values for mAbs.

Results: Simulations from the model with previously suggested sets of parameters did not fit the observed IgG profiles. Attempts to estimate the parameters showed that the model was over-parameterized and Q was estimated to be 0, thus collapsing the model to a one-compartment model. A one-compartment model for IgG contradicts the notion that IgG is distributed throughout the body. Thus, the model was modified to include IgG synthesis, elimination, and FcRn recycling in the peripheral compartment:

          dA1/dt = I01 - (k10 - Ffree∙Vmax/(KM+A1/V1))∙A1 - k12∙A1 + k21∙A2; A1(0) = IgG0∙V1;                                             (2)

          dA2/dt = I02 - (k10 - Ffree∙Vmax/(KM+A2/V2))∙A2 + k12∙A1 - k21∙A2; A2(0) = IgG0∙V2;                                           

         I01 = (k10 - Vmax/(KM + IgG0))∙IgG0∙V1;               I02 = (k10 - Vmax/(KM + IgG0))∙IgG0∙V2.

For simplicity, equal IgG concentrations in the central and peripheral compartments were assumed. Here Ffree is the fraction of receptors unoccupied by the FcRn-targeting mAb. The model (2) fit the data but was still over-parameterized. Fixing V1, V2, and Q to the typical values for IgG (V1=V2=3 L, Q=0.38 L/day) provided the same fit as when these parameters were estimated. The ratio R=Vmax/KM and IgG clearance from each compartment in absence of FcRn binding were estimated as R=0.176 1/day and CL=0.575 L/day with high precision (RSE<7%), while KM constant was estimated as KM=1220 µmol/L with high uncertainty (RSE=65%). At typical IgG concentration of IgG0=80 µmol/L, non-specific IgG clearance that accounts for recycling can be computed as CLNS=2∙(CL-R∙V1/(1+ IgG0/KM)=0.160 L/day, consistent with the expected value for endogenous IgG.

Conclusions: The presented work illustrates how data observed following administration of therapeutic antibodies targeting the FcRn receptor can be used to calibrate an IgG turnover model. Further development of the IgG turnover model could be performed by inclusion of additional experimental data, e.g., following IVIG treatment.



References:
[1] Ryman JT, Meibohm B. Pharmacokinetics of Monoclonal Antibodies. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2017;6(9):576–588. doi:10.1002/psp4.12224
[2] Waldmann, T. A., and Strober,W. (1969). Metabolism of immunoglobulins. Prog. Allergy 13, 1–110.
[3] Jonghan Kim, William L. Hayton, John M. Robinson, and Clark L. Anderson, Kinetics of FcRn-mediated recycling of IgG and albumin in human: Pathophysiology and therapeutic implications using a simplified mechanism-based model, Clin Immunol. 2007 February; 122(2): 146–155. doi:10.1016/j.clim.2006.09.001
[4] Hattersley, J. G., (2009). Mathematical modelling of immune condition dynamics: a clinical perspective. University of Warwick PhD thesis, http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/2755/ , accessed at https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/bf4d/eb879e40283a5fa6fd3809239d037a6ecaa5.pdf
[5] Kendrick Felicity, Evans Neil D., Arnulf Bertrand, Avet-Loiseau Hervé, Decaux Olivier, Dejoie Thomas, Fouquet Guillemette, Guidez Stéphanie, Harel Stéphanie, Hebraud Benjamin, Javaugue Vincent, Richez Valentine, Schraen Susanna, Touzeau Cyrille, Moreau Philippe, Leleu Xavier, Harding Stephen, Chappell Michael J., Analysis of a Compartmental Model of Endogenous Immunoglobulin G Metabolism with Application to Multiple Myeloma, Front. Physiol., 17 March 2017 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00149
[6] Gable Karissa L., Guptill Jeffrey T., Antagonism of the Neonatal Fc Receptor as an Emerging Treatment for Myasthenia Gravis, Frontiers in Immunology, 2020, volume 20, page 3052, DOI=10.3389/fimmu.2019.03052
[7] Ling, LE, Hillson JL, Tiessen RG, Bosje, T, van, Iersel MP, Nix, D.J., Markowitz, L., Cilfone, N.A., Duffner, J., Streisand, J.B., Manning, A.M. and Arroyo, S. (2019), M281, an Anti-FcRn Antibody: Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety Across the Full Range of IgG Reduction in a First-in-Human Study. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther., 105: 1031-1039. doi:10.1002/cpt.1276 


Reference: PAGE 29 (2021) Abstr 9945 [www.page-meeting.org/?abstract=9945]
Poster: Methodology - Other topics
Click to open PDF poster/presentation (click to open)
Top