My Profile

Search abstracts

Lewis Sheiner


2017
Budapest, Hungary



2016
Lisboa, Portugal

2015
Hersonissos, Crete, Greece

2014
Alicante, Spain

2013
Glasgow, Scotland

2012
Venice, Italy

2011
Athens, Greece

2010
Berlin, Germany

2009
St. Petersburg, Russia

2008
Marseille, France

2007
K°benhavn, Denmark

2006
Brugge/Bruges, Belgium

2005
Pamplona, Spain

2004
Uppsala, Sweden

2003
Verona, Italy

2002
Paris, France

2001
Basel, Switzerland

2000
Salamanca, Spain

1999
Saintes, France

1998
Wuppertal, Germany

1997
Glasgow, Scotland

1996
Sandwich, UK

1995
Frankfurt, Germany

1994
Greenford, UK

1993
Paris, France

1992
Basel, Switzerland



Printable version

PAGE. Abstracts of the Annual Meeting of the Population Approach Group in Europe.
ISSN 1871-6032

Reference:
PAGE 23 (2014) Abstr 3103 [www.page-meeting.org/?abstract=3103]


PDF poster/presentation:
Click to open Click to open

Poster: Methodology - Model Evaluation


III-34 Chayan Acharya A diagnostic tool for population models using non-compartmental analysis: nca_ppc functionality for R

Chayan Acharya, Andrew C. Hooker, Siv J÷nsson, Mats O. Karlsson

Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, P.O. Box 591, SE-751 24 Uppsala, Sweden

Objectives: Non-compartmental analysis (NCA) calculates pharmacokinetic (PK) measures related to the systemic exposure to a drug following administration, e.g. area under the concentration-time curve and peak concentration. We developed a new functionality in R, nca_ppc, to (i) perform diagnostic checks for a population model (PopPK diagnosis) and (ii) perform a traditional NCA.

Methods: The nca_ppc functionality estimates the PK measures by traditional NCA procedures [1] for the observed data set. For the PopPK diagnosis, a set of concentration-time profiles is simulated using the associated population model. The nca_ppc functionality estimates the PK measures for each simulated data set and compares them with those estimated from the observed data. The analysis is performed at the population as well as the individual level. The 95% nonparametric prediction interval of the distribution of the simulated population means of each PK measure is compared with the corresponding observed population mean. The individual level comparison is performed based on the deviation of the mean of any simulated PK measure for an individual from the corresponding observed value. The nca_ppc functionality also reports the normalized prediction distribution error (NPDE) of the simulated PK measures for each individual [2].

Results: The nca_ppc functionality produces two default outputs depending on the type of analysis performed, i.e., PopPK diagnosis and regular NCA. The PopPK diagnosis feature of nca_ppc functionality produces 7 sets of graphical outputs to assess the ability of a population model to simulate the concentration-time profile of a drug and thereby identify model misspecification. In addition, tabular outputs are generated showing the values of the PK measures estimated from the observed and the simulated data, along with the deviation, NPDE, regression parameters used to estimate the elimination rate constant and the related population statistics. The tabular output for a regular NCA is similar to the output obtained in commercial software.

Conclusions: The nca_ppc functionality is a versatile and flexible tool-set written in R that successfully estimates PK properties from observed and simulated concentration-time data. It produces a comprehensive set of graphical and tabular output to summarize the statistical results including the model specific outliers. The output is easy to interpret and to use in evaluation of a population model.

Acknowledgement: This work was supported by the DDMoRe (www.ddmore.eu) project.



References:
[1] Gabrielsson, D. Weiner, Non-compartmental analysis, Methods Mol Biol 929 (2012) 377-389.
[2] E. Comets, K. Brendel, F. Mentre, Computing normalised prediction distribution errors to evaluate nonlinear mixed-effect models: the npde add-on package for R, Comput Methods Programs Biomed 90 (2008) 154-166.