My Profile

Search abstracts

Lewis Sheiner


2019
Stockholm, Sweden



2018
Montreux, Switzerland

2017
Budapest, Hungary

2016
Lisboa, Portugal

2015
Hersonissos, Crete, Greece

2014
Alicante, Spain

2013
Glasgow, Scotland

2012
Venice, Italy

2011
Athens, Greece

2010
Berlin, Germany

2009
St. Petersburg, Russia

2008
Marseille, France

2007
KÝbenhavn, Denmark

2006
Brugge/Bruges, Belgium

2005
Pamplona, Spain

2004
Uppsala, Sweden

2003
Verona, Italy

2002
Paris, France

2001
Basel, Switzerland

2000
Salamanca, Spain

1999
Saintes, France

1998
Wuppertal, Germany

1997
Glasgow, Scotland

1996
Sandwich, UK

1995
Frankfurt, Germany

1994
Greenford, UK

1993
Paris, France

1992
Basel, Switzerland



Printable version

PAGE. Abstracts of the Annual Meeting of the Population Approach Group in Europe.
ISSN 1871-6032

Reference:
PAGE 22 (2013) Abstr 2935 [www.page-meeting.org/?abstract=2935]


PDF poster/presentation:
Click to open Click to open

Poster: Other Modelling Applications


II-45 Lorenzo Ridolfi Predictive Modelling Environment - Infrastructure and functionality for pharmacometric activities in R&D

Lorenzo Ridolfi (1), Chris Franklin (1), Oscar Della Pasqua (1)

(1) Clinical Pharmacology Modelling and Simulation, GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park West, Uxbridge, Middlesex UB11 1BT

Objectives:  The Predictive Modelling Environment (PME) supports Clinical Pharmacology Modelling & Simulation, enabling the implementation of M&S activities which are used to facilitate decision making within GSK. The system's architecture has been developed taking into account a pre-defined workflow and the interaction between software packages such as R and NONMEM 7.2.  Here we describe how a server-based tool has been implemented within the regulated R&D environment. Moreover, we show how workflow and software functionalities are integrated to meet the needs of a continuously growing pharmacometric community.

Methods:  Architecture and system requirements to integrate hardware (platforms), software and user interface functionality have been summarised and reviewed against user requirements and workflows for data manipulation, model building, validation and reporting.  An overview of system performance is provided, which includes a GAP analysis and a summary of modelling outputs and typical computation times.

Results:  The current environment provides access to NONMEM 7.2 as executable software in the web and command line (Linux shell), which are linked to a grid engine with PsN, RStudio and R as ancillary tools supporting the pre-defined M&S workflow. Integrated modules have been identified to provide functionality for project management, data warehouse (DCP), data set creation (DEP) as well for analysis and reporting (DMP). In addition, structured user interface features allow efficient access to previously generated files and templates (e.g. reports). Gaps remain in terms of data reuse, as analysis-ready datasets include software- and model-specific syntax. Likewise, workflows may not always be fully transferred across analyses in an automatic manner due to differences in model selection criteria and data set structure.

Conclusions: PME 2.5 is the result of years of internal and external development where the users' needs have been balanced with the industry standards, taking into account the requirements for an integrated workflow. Many of the technical challenges arising from the development and upgrade of modelling and simulation environment are due to differences in the expectation and expertise within the user community, which impose flexibility and consensus on workflows. System modularity, standard processes and grid computing are essential to ensure M&S tools can be upgraded in  a rapidly evolving field.