My Profile

Search abstracts

Lewis Sheiner


2017
Budapest, Hungary



2016
Lisboa, Portugal

2015
Hersonissos, Crete, Greece

2014
Alicante, Spain

2013
Glasgow, Scotland

2012
Venice, Italy

2011
Athens, Greece

2010
Berlin, Germany

2009
St. Petersburg, Russia

2008
Marseille, France

2007
København, Denmark

2006
Brugge/Bruges, Belgium

2005
Pamplona, Spain

2004
Uppsala, Sweden

2003
Verona, Italy

2002
Paris, France

2001
Basel, Switzerland

2000
Salamanca, Spain

1999
Saintes, France

1998
Wuppertal, Germany

1997
Glasgow, Scotland

1996
Sandwich, UK

1995
Frankfurt, Germany

1994
Greenford, UK

1993
Paris, France

1992
Basel, Switzerland



Printable version

PAGE. Abstracts of the Annual Meeting of the Population Approach Group in Europe.
ISSN 1871-6032

Reference:
PAGE 22 (2013) Abstr 2907 [www.page-meeting.org/?abstract=2907]


PDF poster/presentation:
Click to open Click to open

Oral: Methodology - New Tools


A-40 Anne-Gaelle Dosne Application of Sampling Importance Resampling to estimate parameter uncertainty distributions

Anne-Gaëlle Dosne (1), Martin Bergstrand (1), Mats O. Karlsson (1)

(1) Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

Objectives: Develop a method to assess parameter uncertainty for non-linear mixed effects (NLME) models based on Sampling Importance Resampling (SIR) [1]. Compare this method to existing methods for real and simulated data.

The uncertainty in parameter estimates in NLME models is commonly computed using the asymptotic covariance matrix. A well-known limitation of this method is the lack of considering any asymmetry in the parameter uncertainty. In this work, a method based on SIR was developed to improve uncertainty estimation based on the covariance matrix while limiting computational burden.

Methods: A high number (2000-10000) of parameter vectors were sampled from the covariance matrix. For each parameter vector, an importance ratio (IR) was computed by weighting the fit to the original data by the probability density value for the vector given the estimated covariance matrix. Non-parametric uncertainty distributions were then obtained by resampling parameter vectors according to probabilities proportional to the IR. The SIR method was applied to NLME models for real [2-4] and simulated data. Parameter confidence intervals (CIs) and density distributions obtained with SIR were compared to those obtained based on likelihood profiling (LLP), covariance matrix and bootstrap using the FOCEI method in NONMEM 7.2.

Results: Compared to CIs based on the covariance matrix, SIR provided a closer agreement with LLP, especially for parameters showing asymmetric CIs. SIR CIs were in agreement with CIs based on the covariance matrix when the uncertainty was symmetric. SIR also led to CIs in closer agreement to LLP for real data examples where the bootstrap confidence intervals were shown to be inflated [5].

Conclusions: SIR appears as a promising approach to assess parameter uncertainty. While based on the covariance matrix, it can address asymmetry in parameter uncertainty. As opposed to LLP, it directly generates a distribution that can be used for clinical trial simulation. In comparison to a bootstrap SIR allows every parameter vector to be evaluated using all data, which is valuable when the data set is not very large, yet at a very limited computational burden.

Acknowledgements: This work was supported by the DDMoRe (http://www.ddmore.eu/) project.

References:
[1] Rubin DB, Bayesian Statistics. 1988;3:395-402.
[2] Grasela et al., Dev Pharmacol Ther. 1985;8(6):374-83.
[3] Karlsson et al., J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1998;26(2):207-46.
[4] Wählby et al., Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;58(4):367-77.
[5] PAGE 22 (2013) Abstr 2899 [ww.page-meeting.org/?abstract=2899].