2006 - Brugge/Bruges - Belgium

PAGE 2006: Lewis Sheiner Student Session
Anthe Zandvliet

Semi-mechanistic PK/PD model of indisulam in combination with capecitabine: a time-dependent pharmacokinetic interaction contributes to excessive hematological toxicity

Zandvliet, Anthe S. (1), Wandena S. Siegel-Lakhai (1), Jan H.M. Schellens (2,3), William Copalu (4), Gerard Milano (5), Jos H. Beijnen (1,3), Alwin D.R. Huitema (1)

(1) Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/ Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (2) Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/ Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (3) Department of Biomedical Analysis, Section of Drug Toxicology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; (4) Eisai Ltd., London, UK; (5) Oncopharmacology Unit, Nice, France

PDF of presentation

Introduction Indisulam is an experimental sulfonamide anticancer agent which was evaluated in a phase I dose escalation study in combination with capecitabine. Preclinical studies had demonstrated synergistic efficacy in cell lines and xenografts. Indisulam and capecitabine were administered in a treatment cycle of three weeks: a one-hour infusion of indisulam on day 1 and oral doses of capecitabine BID on days 1-14. The combination was well tolerated in the first treatment cycle, but severe side effects were observed in subsequent cycles. This suggested a time-dependent drug-drug interaction. We hypothesized that capecitabine may inhibit the synthesis of the cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP2C9, which is one of the major metabolizing enzymes of indisulam. Myelosuppression, which is a typical side effect of indisulam, was the major toxicity of the combination. Capecitabine may contribute to neutropenic and thrombocytopenic side effects by a pharmacokinetic interaction with indisulam and/or by a direct cytotoxic effect on proliferating neutrophils and thrombocytes.

Aims: The purposes of the current analysis were 1) to evaluate the role of capecitabine in the induction of hematological toxicity during combination therapy with indisulam and capecitabine in patients with colorectal cancer 2) to develop a model describing the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of the combination and 3) to apply this model to predict the severity of neutropenia at various dose levels during multiple treatment cycles.

Methods: Data from the previously published phase I dose escalation study were used to develop a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model. The elimination of indisulam was described by a linear pathway (elimination rate constant k10) and a saturable pathway (maximal elimination rate Vmax, Michaelis Menten constant Km), either of which was tested for inhibition by capecitabine. The elimination rate constant and/or the maximal elimination rate were proportional to the amount of a hypothetical amount of CYP2C9 enzyme, which was set at 1 prior to capecitabine administration. The time profile of this enzyme was described by a transit compartment model. Capecitabine blocked the input into the first compartment during 12 hours after oral administration, which corresponds to the dosing interval of capecitabine. The number of compartments (n) was optimized and the mean transition time (MTT) from the first to the nth compartment was estimated during model development.
Myelosuppressive effects of both drugs were estimated as elements of a semi-physiological model describing the time profiles of neutrophils and thrombocytes. This model comprised a progenitor compartment for proliferating blood cells, linked to a series of three compartments representing the maturation chain in the bone marrow and leading to the central circulation compartment.
All parameters were estimated using the first order method of NONMEM after logarithmic transformation of the data. The model was validated by cross validation and a visual predictive check. A simulation study was performed to evaluate the safety of the combination, in comparison to single agent therapy with indisulam, at continuing treatment cycles at various dose levels. At each cycle and for each dose level, cohorts of more than 10,000 patients were simulated to determine the risk of dose limiting neutropenia.

Results: The pharmacokinetic profile of indisulam at multiple treatment cycles was adequately described by an interaction model with an inhibitory effect of capecitabine on the saturable elimination pathway. The time-dependent effect of capecitabine was best described by a transition model with 5 compartments. The mean transition time (or turnover time) of the hypothetical CYP2C9 enzyme was 9.2 days and the variability between patients was 62%. The pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction resulted in increased exposure to indisulam at the second and subsequent treatment cycles.
The risk of hematological toxicity was only dependent on exposure to indisulam. Thus, capecitabine had no significant additional effect on the proliferation rate of neutrophils and thrombocytes. The simulation study demonstrated that the risk of dose limiting neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <0.5*10^9/L during >7 days) increased with duration of treatment and with dose. When indisulam was combined with capecitabine, the risk of severe hematological toxicity increased dramatically from cycle 1 to cycle 2. For instance, the risk at dose limiting neutropenia increased 5-fold from cycle 1 (0.037, S.E.=0.001) to cycle 2 (0.183, S.E.=0.004) after treatment with 600 mg/m2 indisulam and 1250 mg/m2 capecitabine BID. At the third treatment cycle, the risk of dose limiting neutropenia was 0.21 (S.E.=0.004) after treatment with 550 mg/m2 indisulam in combination with 1250 mg/m2 capecitabine BID. This was similar to the risk at the third cycle after treatment with indisulam mono-therapy at the recommended dose of 700 mg/m2 (0.23, S.E.=0.004). Therefore, the combination of 550 mg/m2 indisulam and 1250 mg/m2 capecitabine BID was considered safe for further studies.

Conclusions: Co-administration of capecitabine caused a time-dependent inhibition of the saturable elimination pathway of indisulam. The pharmacokinetic interaction between indisulam and capecitabine explains the excessive hematological toxicity of the combination after multiple treatment cycles. Simulation studies have demonstrated that the risk of dose limiting neutropenia is acceptable at a dose level of indisulam 550 mg/m2 in combination with capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 BID during multiple treatment cycles.

[1] Gunes A, Coskun U, Boruban C, et al: Inhibitory Effect of 5-Fluorouracil on Cytochrome P450 2C9 Activity in Cancer Patients. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 98:197-200, 2006
[2] Zandvliet AS, Yasuda S, Copalu W, et al: A physiologically based population pharmacokinetic model describing the non-linear disposition and blood distribution of indisulam in Caucasian and Japanese patients. PAGE Abstracts of the Annual Meeting of the Population Approach Group in Europe, 2005. (oral presentation)
[3] van Kesteren C, Zandvliet AS, Karlsson MO, et al: Semi-physiological model describing the hematological toxicity of the anti-cancer agent indisulam. Invest New Drugs 23:225-234, 2005

Reference: PAGE 15 (2006) Abstr 926 [www.page-meeting.org/?abstract=926]
Oral Presentation: Lewis Sheiner Student Session