My Profile

Search abstracts

Lewis Sheiner


2019
Stockholm, Sweden



2018
Montreux, Switzerland

2017
Budapest, Hungary

2016
Lisboa, Portugal

2015
Hersonissos, Crete, Greece

2014
Alicante, Spain

2013
Glasgow, Scotland

2012
Venice, Italy

2011
Athens, Greece

2010
Berlin, Germany

2009
St. Petersburg, Russia

2008
Marseille, France

2007
KÝbenhavn, Denmark

2006
Brugge/Bruges, Belgium

2005
Pamplona, Spain

2004
Uppsala, Sweden

2003
Verona, Italy

2002
Paris, France

2001
Basel, Switzerland

2000
Salamanca, Spain

1999
Saintes, France

1998
Wuppertal, Germany

1997
Glasgow, Scotland

1996
Sandwich, UK

1995
Frankfurt, Germany

1994
Greenford, UK

1993
Paris, France

1992
Basel, Switzerland



Printable version

PAGE. Abstracts of the Annual Meeting of the Population Approach Group in Europe.
ISSN 1871-6032

Reference:
PAGE 14 (2005) Abstr 729 [www.page-meeting.org/?abstract=729]


poster


Thorsten Lehr A new CNS active drug and its metabolite: a population pharmacokinetic analysis

T. Lehr (1), C. Tillmann (2), A. Staab (2), R. Krug-Schmid (2), D. Trommeshauser (2), H.G. Schaefer (2), C. Kloft (1)

(1) Dept. Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmacy, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany (2) Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach a.d.R., Germany

PDF of poster

Objectives & Background: A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for a new CNS active drug in clinical development and its metabolite was to be developed based on data from four phase I (healthy as well as renally impaired subjects) and two phase IIa studies (target population). The model development should also include an initial screening for covariates that might influence the PK characteristics of the drug and/or its metabolite.

Methods: Plasma data of 119 subjects (single and multiple oral dosing or iv infusion) consisting of 1819 parent and 1333 metabolite concentrations were fitted simultaneously. The analysis was performed using the FOCE INTERACTION estimation method implemented in NONMEM.

Results: Plasma concentration-time profiles (PCTP) were best described by a two compartment model for the parent compound as well as for the metabolite.

Metabolic formation was accounted for by a transfer constant (KMET) between the central volumes of both compounds. KMET was fixed to a value reflecting the recovery of the metabolite in urine (7%). Interindividual variability could be included for CLP, CLM, V2, V4 and F1. The estimates for parent drug and metabolite revealed large volumes of distribution and low clearances resulting in long half-lives. The initial covariate screening suggested that sex on F1 has a significant influence on the PCTP which warrant further investigations.

Conclusion: A population PK model has been successfully developed describing the plasma concentration of the parent compound and its metabolite. Influence of covariates will be further evaluated in a larger number of patients presumably exhibiting wider distributions of covariates. The model developed can serve as a tool to simulate and evaluate different dosing regimens for further trials for the drug under development.