Next: 34
Lack of Relationship
Up: PAGE '95: ABSTRACT LIST
Previous: 32
Influence of Apomorphine
Ferdie Rombout
N.V. Organon, 5340 BH, Oss, Netherlands
There are differences in the implementation of the population
approach in industry when compared to the population approach in
an academic setting. These differences range from the time
pressure to the regulatory requirements. This presentation
describes the process involved within our company to design,
evaluate and report population pharmacokinetic and
pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies. A phase IIa study will
serve as an example.
Some of the items presented are
- Population approach and GLP/GCP
-
In N.V. Organon the population approach is the
responsibility of the Department of Drug Metabolism and
Kinetics which is subjected to GLP. Population approach
and GLP means defining the complete data acquisition,
evaluation and reporting process at forehand.
- Population approach and time compression
-
Due to the nature of population analyses, the evaluation
is almost always on the critical path. This means that
there are problems to be solved. These problems are
mainly related to the hardware, software, logistics and
the evaluation process (model development).
- Scientific versus industrial needs, a constant balance
-
Studies are not always performed because of scientific
interest, this means that especially due to lack of time,
scientific interest can not always be satisfied. This
also means that if a population approach is performed,
somewhere there should be point to be satisfied with the
results of model building. For this reason clear
objectives should be stated.
- From data acquisition to reporting: Practical stages in
model development
-
In view of the above mentioned reasons, the stage of data
acquisition to reporting should be as short as possible,
without loosing interesting/important facts.
Standardization (although seemingly impossible for the
model development) should be a goal. All the steps
starting with writing the protocol via data checking,
structural model building, covariate model building,
validation, reporting and review are all of same
equivalent importance and should be well documented.
- Population approach and regulatory requirements
-
Regulatory requirements for the process of population
analyses are not well defined, neither is the place of
population approach within the requirements for a new
drug approval. This might be partly due to the nature of
population approach itself, standardizing the process
will increase its regulatory possibilities.
Next: 34
Lack of Relationship
Up: PAGE '95: ABSTRACT LIST
Previous: 32
Influence of Apomorphine
harnisch@pollux.zedat.fu-berlin.de