IV-35 Richard Höglund

A population pharmacokinetic model of piperaquine in pregnant and non-pregnant women with uncomplicated P.falciparum malaria

Richard Höglund (1), Ishag Adam (2), Warunee Hanpithakpong (3), Michael Ashton (1), Nicholas Day (3,4), Nicholas White (3,4), Niklas Lindegardh (3,4), Francois Nosten (3,4,5), Joel Tarning (3,4)

Institution: (1) Unit for Pharmacokinetics and Drug Metabolism, Department of Pharmacology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; (2) Faculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan; (3) Centre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK; (4) Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand; (5) Shoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mae Sot, Thailand

Objectives: Pregnancy has been associated with an increased risk of contracting a malaria infection and with higher risk of severe malaria. The pharmacokinetic properties of many antimalarials are also altered during pregnancy, often resulting in a decreased drug exposure. Piperaquine is a promising antimalarial partner drug used in a fixed-dose combination with dihydroartemisinin. The aim of this study was to investigate the population pharmacokinetics of piperaquine in pregnant and non-pregnant Sudanese women with uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria.

Methods: Patients received a standard dose regimen of the fixed oral piperaquine-dihydroartemisinin combination treatment. Dense plasma samples were collected and analysed using a previously published LC-MS/MS method. Data from 12 pregnant and 12 non-pregnant women were analysed using non-linear mixed effects modelling. A Monte Carlo Mapped Power (MCMP) analysis was conducted based on a previously published study to evaluate the power of detecting covariates in this relatively small study population.

Results: A three-compartment disposition model with a transit-absorption model described the observed data well. Body weight was added as an allometric function on all clearance and volume parameters. A statistical significant difference in terminal half-life between pregnant and non-pregnant women was found, but there were no differences in total drug exposure. The MCMP analysis indicated a minimum of 13 pregnant and 13 non-pregnant women to identify pregnancy as a covariate on relevant pharmacokinetic parameters. Pregnancy was therefore evaluated as a categorical and continuous covariate (i.e. estimate gestational age) in a full covariate approach.

Conclusions: The population pharmacokinetic properties of piperaquine were well described by a three-compartment disposition model in pregnant and non-pregnant women with uncomplicated malaria. The full covariate approach resulted in no major difference in piperaquine clearance and post-hoc estimates of piperaquine exposure were similar in the two groups. Data presented here is reassuring and do not warrant a dose adjustment on account of pregnancy in this vulnerable population.

 

Reference: PAGE 21 () Abstr 2583 [www.page-meeting.org/?abstract=2583]

Poster: Infection